The Finer Points: A Systematic Comparison of Point-Cloud Extractors for Radar Odometry

TL;DR

This paper systematically compares 13 radar point-cloud extractors for odometry, revealing that the simplest method, K-strongest, performs best and emphasizing the importance of parameter tuning for accuracy.

Contribution

It provides the first comprehensive evaluation of radar point-cloud extractors for odometry, highlighting the effectiveness of simple methods and the impact of tuning.

Findings

K-strongest extractor outperforms others by 13.59% and 24.94%.

Parameter tuning significantly improves odometry accuracy.

Simple extraction methods can be more effective than complex ones.

Abstract

A key element of many odometry pipelines using spinning frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) radar is the extraction of a point-cloud from the raw signal. This extraction greatly impacts the overall performance of point-cloud-based odometry. This paper provides a first-of-its-kind, comprehensive comparison of 13 common radar point-cloud extractors for the task of iterative closest point based odometry in autonomous driving environments. Each extractor's parameters are tuned and tested on two FMCW radar datasets using approximately 176km of data from public roads. We find that the simplest, and fastest extractor, K-strongest, is the best overall extractor, consistently outperforming the average by 13.59% and 24.94% on each dataset, respectively. Additionally, we highlight the significance of tuning an extractor and the substantial improvement in odometry accuracy that it yields.