Undersampling effects on observed periods of coronal oscillations
Daye Lim, Tom Van Doorsselaere, Valery M. Nakariakov, Dmitrii Y., Kolotkov, Yuhang Gao, and David Berghmans

TL;DR
This study investigates how undersampling affects observed periods of decayless coronal oscillations, revealing that short loop oscillation periods may be overestimated due to sampling effects, explaining observed period-length relationships.
Contribution
It demonstrates that undersampling can produce the two observed period-length relationships, offering an explanation for the decayless oscillation period distributions.
Findings
Undersampling causes overestimation of short loop oscillation periods.
Two observed period-length relationships can result from sampling effects.
Long periods in short loops may be artifacts of undersampling.
Abstract
Context. Recent observations of decayless transverse oscillations have shown two branches in the relationship between periods and loop lengths. One is a linear relationship, interpreted as a standing mode. The other shows almost no correlation and has not yet been interpreted conclusively. Aims. We investigated the undersampling effect on observed periods of decayless oscillations. Methods. We considered oscillating coronal loops that closely follow the observed loop length distribution. Assuming that all oscillations are standing waves, we modeled a signal that represents decayless oscillations where the period is proportional to the loop length and the amplitude and phase are randomly drawn. A downsampled signal was generated from the original signal by considering different sample rates that mimic temporal cadences of telescopes, and periods for sampled signals were analysed using…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
