Research Citations Building Trust in Wikipedia
Michael Taylor, Carlos Areia, Kath Burton, Charles Watkinson

TL;DR
This study investigates researchers' perceptions of Wikipedia citations, revealing generally positive attitudes and highlighting differences across disciplines and publication types, with implications for combating misinformation.
Contribution
It provides empirical data on author sentiment towards Wikipedia citations and explores how research citations may enhance trust and reduce misinformation.
Findings
Positive researcher sentiment towards Wikipedia citations
Significant differences across disciplines and publication types
No significant difference between open and closed access articles
Abstract
The use of Wikipedia citations in scholarly research has been the topic of much inquiry over the past decade. A cross-publisher study (Taylor & Francis and University of Michigan Press) convened by Digital Science was established in late 2022 to explore author sentiment towards Wikipedia as a trusted source of information. A short survey was designed to poll published authors about views and uses of Wikipedia and explore how the increased addition of research citations in Wikipedia might help combat misinformation in the context of increasing public engagement with and access to validated research sources. With 21,854 surveys sent, targeting 40,402 papers mentioned in Wikipedia, a total of 750 complete surveys from 60 countries were included in this analysis. In general, responses revealed a positive sentiment towards research citation in Wikipedia and the researcher engagement…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsWikis in Education and Collaboration · Topic Modeling · Social Media in Health Education
