Improving LLM Reasoning with Multi-Agent Tree-of-Thought Validator Agent
Fatemeh Haji, Mazal Bethany, Maryam Tabar, Jason Chiang, Anthony Rios,, Peyman Najafirad

TL;DR
This paper introduces a multi-agent Tree-of-Thought approach with a Thought Validator to improve reasoning accuracy and trustworthiness in large language models, outperforming existing methods on the GSM8K dataset.
Contribution
It presents a novel combination of ToT reasoning with a validator agent to filter out flawed reasoning paths, enhancing robustness and accuracy.
Findings
Outperforms standard ToT by 5.6% on GSM8K
Enables more trustworthy reasoning through validation
Demonstrates effectiveness across four different LLMs
Abstract
Multi-agent strategies have emerged as a promising approach to enhance the reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) by assigning specialized roles in the problem-solving process. Concurrently, Tree of Thoughts (ToT) methods have shown potential in improving reasoning for complex question-answering tasks by exploring diverse reasoning paths. A critical limitation in multi-agent reasoning is the 'Reasoner' agent's shallow exploration of reasoning paths. While ToT strategies could help mitigate this problem, they may generate flawed reasoning branches, which could harm the trustworthiness of the final answer. To leverage the strengths of both multi-agent reasoning and ToT strategies, we introduce a novel approach combining ToT-based Reasoner agents with a Thought Validator agent. Multiple Reasoner agents operate in parallel, employing ToT to explore diverse reasoning paths. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSemantic Web and Ontologies · Business Process Modeling and Analysis · Modeling, Simulation, and Optimization
