On the effect of "glancing" collisions in the cold atom vacuum standard
Stephen P. Eckel, Daniel S. Barker, James A. Fedchak, Jacek K{\l}os, Julia Scherschligt, Eite Tiesinga

TL;DR
This paper models how glancing collisions affect vacuum pressure measurements in cold atom standards, revealing non-exponential atom loss and quantifying shifts in loss rate coefficients due to these collisions.
Contribution
It introduces a probabilistic model for glancing collisions in cold atom vacuum standards, showing their impact on loss rates and pressure readings, which was not previously accounted for.
Findings
Glancing collisions cause up to 0.6% shift in loss rate predictions for lithium.
In zero trap depth limit, shifts up to 2.2% in rubidium loss rate coefficients.
Atom loss in the trap follows a non-exponential decay due to glancing collisions.
Abstract
We theoretically investigate the effect of ``glancing" collisions on the ultra-high vacuum (UHV) pressure readings of the cold atom vacuum standard (CAVS), based on either ultracold Li or Rb atoms. Here, glancing collisions are those collisions between ultracold atoms and room-temperature background atoms or molecules in the vacuum that do not impart enough kinetic energy to eject an ultracold atom from its trap. Our model is wholly probabilistic and shows that the number of the ultracold atoms remaining in the trap as a function of time is non-exponential. We update the recent results of a comparison between a traditional pressure standard -- a combined flowmeter and dynamic expansion system -- to the CAVS [D.S. Barker, et al., arXiv:2302.12143] to reflect the results of our model. We find that the effect of glancing collisions shifts the theoretical predictions of the total…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation · Advanced Frequency and Time Standards · Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques
