Contrastive Learning for Character Detection in Ancient Greek Papyri

TL;DR

This study evaluates contrastive learning using SimCLR for ancient Greek letter recognition, finding traditional supervised models outperform SimCLR, likely due to semantic shifts caused by cropping strategies.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive comparison of contrastive learning versus traditional methods in ancient Greek character detection, highlighting limitations of SimCLR in this context.

Findings

SimCLR does not outperform baseline models in letter recognition.

Traditional supervised models with cross-entropy loss perform better.

Cropping strategies in SimCLR may cause semantic shifts reducing effectiveness.

Abstract

This thesis investigates the effectiveness of SimCLR, a contrastive learning technique, in Greek letter recognition, focusing on the impact of various augmentation techniques. We pretrain the SimCLR backbone using the Alpub dataset (pretraining dataset) and fine-tune it on a smaller ICDAR dataset (finetuning dataset) to compare SimCLR's performance against traditional baseline models, which use cross-entropy and triplet loss functions. Additionally, we explore the role of different data augmentation strategies, essential for the SimCLR training process. Methodologically, we examine three primary approaches: (1) a baseline model using cross-entropy loss, (2) a triplet embedding model with a classification layer, and (3) a SimCLR pretrained model with a classification layer. Initially, we train the baseline, triplet, and SimCLR models using 93 augmentations on ResNet-18 and ResNet-50 networks with the ICDAR dataset. From these, the top four augmentations are selected using a statistical t-test. Pretraining of SimCLR is conducted on the Alpub dataset, followed by fine-tuning on the ICDAR dataset. The triplet loss model undergoes a similar process, being pretrained on the top four augmentations before fine-tuning on ICDAR. Our experiments show that SimCLR does not outperform the baselines in letter recognition tasks. The baseline model with cross-entropy loss demonstrates better performance than both SimCLR and the triplet loss model. This study provides a detailed evaluation of contrastive learning for letter recognition, highlighting SimCLR's limitations while emphasizing the strengths of traditional supervised learning models in this task. We believe SimCLR's cropping strategies may cause a semantic shift in the input image, reducing training effectiveness despite the large pretraining dataset. Our code is available at https://github.com/DIVA-DIA/MT_augmentation_and_contrastive_learning/.