Do Test and Environmental Complexity Increase Flakiness? An Empirical Study of SAP HANA

TL;DR

This empirical study investigates how test and environment complexity factors, especially test duration, influence test flakiness in SAP HANA, providing insights for mitigation strategies in complex testing environments.

Contribution

It identifies the strong correlation between test duration and flakiness, suggesting test splitting as an effective mitigation approach in practice.

Findings

Longer tests are more flaky, with a correlation of 0.79.

Infrastructure load does not significantly impact flakiness.

Splitting long tests can reduce flakiness and improve testing efficiency.

Abstract

Background: Test flakiness is a major problem in the software industry. Flaky tests fail seemingly at random without changes to the code and thus impede continuous integration (CI). Some researchers argue that all tests can be considered flaky and that tests only differ in their frequency of flaky failures. Aims: With the goal of developing mitigation strategies to reduce the negative impact of test flakiness, we study characteristics of tests and the test environment that potentially impact test flakiness. Method: We construct two datasets based on SAP HANA's test results over a 12-week period: one based on production data, the other based on targeted test executions from a dedicated flakiness experiment. We conduct correlation analysis for test and test environment characteristics with respect to their influence on the frequency of flaky test failures. Results: In our study, the average test execution time had the strongest positive correlation with the test flakiness rate (r = 0.79), which confirms previous studies. Potential reasons for higher flakiness include the larger test scope of long-running tests or test executions on a slower test infrastructure. Interestingly, the load on the testing infrastructure was not correlated with test flakiness. The relationship between test flakiness and required resources for test execution is inconclusive. Conclusions: Based on our findings, we conclude that splitting long-running tests can be an important measure for practitioners to cope with test flakiness, as it enables parallelization of test executions and also reduces the cost of re-executions. This effectively decreases the negative effects of test flakiness in complex testing environments. However, when splitting long-running tests, practitioners need to consider the potential test setup overhead of test splits.