A global optimum-informed greedy algorithm for A-optimal experimental design
Christian Aarset

TL;DR
This paper introduces a framework to improve greedy algorithms for optimal experimental design by leveraging global optimality insights, leading to better sensor placement strategies.
Contribution
It presents a novel framework that rejects sub-optimal greedy indices in experimental design, enhancing the effectiveness of greedy algorithms.
Findings
Framework effectively identifies and rejects sub-optimal greedy choices
Numerical experiments show improved sensor placement outcomes
Method leverages recent advances in non-smooth convex optimization
Abstract
Optimal experimental design (OED) concerns itself with identifying ideal methods of data collection, e.g.~via sensor placement. The \emph{greedy algorithm}, that is, placing one sensor at a time, in an iteratively optimal manner, stands as an extremely robust and easily executed algorithm for this purpose. However, it is a priori unclear whether this algorithm leads to sub-optimal regimes. Taking advantage of the author's recent work on non-smooth convex optimality criteria for OED, we here present a framework for rejection of sub-optimal greedy indices, and study the numerical benefits this offers.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOptimal Experimental Design Methods · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
