The physical origin of positive metallicity radial gradients in high-redshift galaxies: insights from the FIRE-2 cosmological hydrodynamic simulations
Xunda Sun, Xin Wang, Xiangcheng Ma, Kai Wang, Andrew Wetzel, Claude-Andr\'e Faucher-Gigu\`ere, Philip F. Hopkins, Du\v{s}an Kere\v{s}, Russell L. Graf, Andrew Marszewski, Jonathan Stern, Guochao Sun, Lei Sun, Keyer Thyme

TL;DR
This study uses FIRE-2 simulations to explore how gas-phase metallicity gradients evolve in high-redshift galaxies, revealing the role of stellar feedback, star formation, and kinematics in creating positive metallicity gradients.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed analysis of the origin and evolution of positive metallicity gradients in high-redshift galaxies using cosmological hydrodynamic simulations.
Findings
Positive metallicity gradients occur in about 7% of galaxies between redshifts 0.4 and 3.
Galaxies with high sSFR and low rotational support are more likely to develop positive gradients.
Stellar feedback-driven gas flows are key in redistributing metals and shaping metallicity gradients.
Abstract
Using the FIRE-2 cosmological zoom-in simulations, we investigate the temporal evolution of gas-phase metallicity radial gradients of Milky Way-mass progenitors in the redshift range of . We pay special attention to the occurrence of positive (i.e. inverted) metallicity gradients -- where metallicity increases with galactocentric radius. This trend, contrary to the more commonly observed negative radial gradients, has been frequently seen in recent spatially resolved grism observations. The rate of occurrence of positive gradients in FIRE-2 is about for and at higher redshifts (), broadly consistent with observations. Moreover, we investigate the correlations among galaxy metallicity gradient, stellar mass, star formation rate (SFR), and degree of rotational support. Metallicity gradients show a strong correlation with both sSFR and the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
