Can Kans (re)discover predictive models for Direct-Drive Laser Fusion?
Rahman Ejaz, Varchas Gopalaswamy, Riccardo Betti, Aarne Lees and, Christopher Kanan

TL;DR
This paper explores the use of Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) as a novel data-driven approach for predictive modeling in high-complexity, data-scarce laser fusion physics, demonstrating potential advantages over traditional physics-informed learning methods.
Contribution
It introduces KANs as an alternative to PIL for physics modeling, showing their effectiveness in high-energy laser fusion applications with limited data.
Findings
KANs achieve high prediction accuracy and interpretability.
KANs outperform baseline MLP models in generalization.
KANs show promise in data-starved physics domains.
Abstract
The domain of laser fusion presents a unique and challenging predictive modeling application landscape for machine learning methods due to high problem complexity and limited training data. Data-driven approaches utilizing prescribed functional forms, inductive biases and physics-informed learning (PIL) schemes have been successful in the past for achieving desired generalization ability and model interpretation that aligns with physics expectations. In complex multi-physics application domains, however, it is not always obvious how architectural biases or discriminative penalties can be formulated. In this work, focusing on nuclear fusion energy using high powered lasers, we present the use of Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) as an alternative to PIL for developing a new type of data-driven predictive model which is able to achieve high prediction accuracy and physics…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMagnetic confinement fusion research · Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
Methods+ ( 1 ) ⟷ 805 ⟷ ( 330 ) ⟷ 4056|How do I file a complaint with Expedia?
