Towards certifiable AI in aviation: landscape, challenges, and opportunities
Hymalai Bello, Daniel Gei{\ss}ler, Lala Ray, Stefan M\"uller-Div\'eky,, Peter M\"uller, Shannon Kittrell, Mengxi Liu, Bo Zhou, Paul Lukowicz

TL;DR
This paper explores the landscape, challenges, and opportunities for certifying AI systems in aviation, emphasizing the need for qualification beyond just performance metrics to ensure safety and robustness.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive mind map of formal AI certification in avionics and highlights key challenges and considerations for certifying AI in safety-critical aviation systems.
Findings
Certification challenges are significant for AI in avionics.
Qualification requires more than performance metrics.
A need for new standards and approaches in AI certification.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods are powerful tools for various domains, including critical fields such as avionics, where certification is required to achieve and maintain an acceptable level of safety. General solutions for safety-critical systems must address three main questions: Is it suitable? What drives the system's decisions? Is it robust to errors/attacks? This is more complex in AI than in traditional methods. In this context, this paper presents a comprehensive mind map of formal AI certification in avionics. It highlights the challenges of certifying AI development with an example to emphasize the need for qualification beyond performance metrics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuality and Safety in Healthcare · Risk and Safety Analysis · Occupational Health and Safety Research
