Stark Decline in Journalists' Use of Preprints Post-pandemic
Juan Pablo Alperin, Kenneth Shores, Alice Fleerackers, Natascha, Chtena

TL;DR
This paper examines the decline in journalists' use of preprints after the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting increased caution and the implications for science communication.
Contribution
It provides an analysis of media coverage trends of preprints from 2014 to 2023, revealing a significant post-pandemic decline and discussing its implications.
Findings
Media coverage of preprints declined significantly post-pandemic
Heightened awareness of preprint risks led to more cautious reporting
The decline raises questions about preprints' future role in science communication
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the use of preprints, aiding rapid research dissemination but also facilitating the spread of misinformation. This study analyzes media coverage of preprints from 2014 to 2023, revealing a significant post-pandemic decline. Our findings suggest that heightened awareness of the risks associated with preprints has led to more cautious media practices. While the decline in preprint coverage may mitigate concerns about premature media exposure, it also raises questions about the future role of preprints in science communication, especially during emergencies. Balanced policies based on up-to-date evidence are needed to address this shift.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
