Optimal Operation of Distribution System Operator and the Impact of Peer-to-Peer Transactions

TL;DR

This paper proposes an optimal operation framework for distribution system operators managing prosumers engaged in P2P energy trading, analyzing its impact on system dispatch, energy exchange, and financial distribution.

Contribution

It introduces a novel optimal operation approach for DSOs considering P2P transactions and demonstrates that certain P2P trading formats do not affect system dispatch or physical power flow.

Findings

P2P trading affects energy exchange with wholesale markets but not internal dispatch.

Different real-time power matching levels influence total surplus in the network.

P2P trading following the proposed format does not impact physical power flow or DSO dispatch decisions.

Abstract

Peer-to-peer (P2P) energy trading, commonly recognized as a decentralized approach, has emerged as a popular way to better utilize distributed energy resources (DERs). In order to better manage this user-side decentralized approach from a system operator's point of view, this paper proposes an optimal operation approach for distribution system operators (DSO), comprising internal prosumers who engage in P2P transactions. The DSO is assumed to be a financial neutral entity, holding the responsibility of aggregating the surplus energy and deficit demand of prosumers after their P2P transactions while dispatching DERs and considering network integrity. Impacts of P2P transactions on DSO's optimal operation have been studied. Results indicate that energy matching P2P trading where only the total amount of energy over a given period of time is defined may affect quantities of energy exchanged between the DSO and the wholesale market, but not internal dispatch decisions of the DSO. Different levels of real-time power consistency may lead to different total surpluses in the distribution network. For the real-time power matching P2P trading, as a special case of energy matching P2P trading, the provided energy and total surplus are not affected. In other words, DSO can safely ignore P2P transactions if they follow the format defined in this paper. Case studies verify these conclusions and further demonstrate that P2P trading will not affect physical power flow of the whole system, but the financial distribution between the DSO and prosumers.