Simultaneous Crystallization Effects in Multiple Levitated Plasma-Functionalized Graphene Nanoflake Nanofluid Droplets

TL;DR

This study investigates how nanoparticles influence the crystallization process in levitated nanofluid droplets, revealing effects on crystal growth, defect formation, and optical properties during freezing and decomposition.

Contribution

It provides new insights into the effects of nanoparticles on crystallization dynamics in levitated nanofluids, a relatively unexplored area.

Findings

Nanoparticles enhance crystal growth rate via improved mass transfer.

Crystallization leads to more defects and cracking in the ice shell.

Post-decomposition, droplets become more transparent and closer to water in appearance.

Abstract

Acoustic levitation is a container-free method for examining novel crystallization effects, though liquid-to-solid phase change has seen little investigation for levitated nanofluids. Recent developments have allowed for examining the morphological and temperature evolution of multiple levitated nanofluid droplets freezing simultaneously. The fundamental effect of adding nanoparticles to a levitated crystallization system is crystal growth rate enhancement from improved mass transfer at the growing solid front. Nucleation times are unaffected as freezing is initiated by secondary ice nucleation particles (INPs). Instead, the enhancement produces higher instantaneous nucleation pressures and more cracking in the primary ice shell. In turn, more INPs are ejected, resulting in faster protrusion formation on the droplet surface (hastened further in systems containing adjacent droplets). The crystal matrix also includes more defects, resulting in liquid escaping and forming beads at the droplet base and optical clarity loss. During crystal decomposition, thermal gradients create convective currents dampened by the same transport phenomena that enhance crystal growth. Suspension loss after a crystallization-decomposition cycle reduced opacity and light absorbance such that the droplets were 62% closer in appearance to water. However, the non-isobaric, sample-encompassing cooling process resulted in smaller particle clusters than if the droplets were frozen on a solid surface.