Negative Sampling in Recommendation: A Survey and Future Directions
Haokai Ma, Ruobing Xie, Lei Meng, Fuli Feng, Xiaoyu Du, Xingwu Sun, Zhanhui Kang, Xiangxu Meng

TL;DR
This paper surveys negative sampling techniques in recommender systems, emphasizing their importance in capturing negative user feedback, analyzing existing strategies, challenges, and future research directions.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive classification and analysis of negative sampling methods in RS, highlighting challenges and proposing future research directions.
Findings
Negative sampling effectively reveals genuine negative user preferences.
Existing strategies are classified into five categories with distinct techniques.
Future directions include tailored negative sampling for diverse RS scenarios.
Abstract
Recommender system (RS) aims to capture personalized preferences from massive user behaviors, making them pivotal in the era of information explosion. However, the presence of ``information cocoons'', interaction sparsity, cold-start problem and feedback loops inherent in RS make users interact with a limited number of items. Conventional recommendation algorithms typically focus on the positive historical behaviors, while neglecting the essential role of negative feedback in user preference understanding. As a promising but easy-to-ignored area, negative sampling is proficients in revealing the genuine negative aspect inherent in user behaviors, emerging as an inescapable procedure in RS. In this survey, we first discuss existing user feedback, the critical role of negative sampling and the optimization objectives in RS and thoroughly analyze challenges that consistently impede its…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpam and Phishing Detection · HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
MethodsFocus
