Phantom-based gradient waveform measurements with compensated variable-prephasing: Description and application to EPI at 7T

TL;DR

This paper introduces a new compensated variable-prephasing (CVP) method for precise phantom-based gradient waveform measurements, improving accuracy over existing methods and enabling better trajectory corrections in high-field MRI imaging.

Contribution

The paper presents a novel CVP technique that accounts for all gradient effects, enhancing measurement accuracy compared to traditional VP methods.

Findings

CVP compensates for lingering oscillations in gradient measurements.

All three methods produced high-quality EPI images despite differences.

CVP showed the most reliable measurements in experimental tests.

Abstract

Purpose: Introducing "compensated variable-prephasing" (CVP), a phantom-based method for gradient waveform measurements. The technique is based on the "variable-prephasing" (VP) method, but takes into account the effects of all gradients involved in the measurement. Methods: We conducted measurements of a trapezoidal test gradient, and of an EPI readout gradient train with three approaches: VP, CVP, and "fully compensated variable-prephasing" (FCVP). We compared them to one another and to predictions based on the gradient system transfer function. Furthermore, we used the measured and predicted EPI gradients for trajectory corrections in phantom images on a 7T scanner. Results: The VP gradient measurements are confounded by lingering oscillations of the prephasing gradients, which are compensated in the CVP and FCVP measurements. FCVP is vulnerable to a sign asymmetry in the gradient chain. However, the trajectories determined by all three methods resulted in comparably high EPI image quality. Conclusion: We present a new approach allowing for phantom-based gradient waveform measurements with high precision, which can be useful for trajectory corrections in non-Cartesian or single-shot imaging techniques. In our experimental setup, the proposed "compensated variable-prephasing" method provided the most reliable gradient measurements of the different techniques we compared.