Equilibria and Their Stability Do Not Depend on the Control Barrier Function in Safe Optimization-Based Control
Yiting Chen, Pol Mestres, Jorge Cortes, Emiliano Dall'Anese

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the choice of control barrier function (CBF) does not influence the number, location, or stability of equilibria in safe optimization-based control systems, especially within the safe set boundary.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical analysis showing that CBF selection does not affect equilibrium properties, clarifying the role of CBFs in safe control design.
Findings
Equilibria inside the safe set are unaffected by CBF choice.
Undesirable equilibria only occur on the safe set boundary.
Stability of equilibria is independent of the CBF used.
Abstract
Control barrier functions (CBFs) play a critical role in the design of safe optimization-based controllers for control-affine systems. Given a CBF associated with a desired ``safe'' set, the typical approach consists in embedding CBF-based constraints into the optimization problem defining the control law to enforce forward invariance of the safe set. While this approach effectively guarantees safety for a given CBF, the CBF-based control law can introduce undesirable equilibrium points (i.e., points that are not equilibria of the original system); open questions remain on how the choice of CBF influences the number and locations of undesirable equilibria and, in general, the dynamics of the closed-loop system. This paper investigates how the choice of CBF impacts the dynamics of the closed-loop system and shows that: (i) The CBF does not affect the number, location, and (local)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
