Understanding and Mitigating the Impacts of Differentially Private Census Data on State Level Redistricting
Christian Cianfarani, Aloni Cohen

TL;DR
This paper investigates how differential privacy in the 2020 Census affects redistricting, showing that noise can be understood and mitigated, thus supporting fair district drawing despite privacy measures.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of privacy-induced discrepancies in redistricting data and proposes models to account for and mitigate these effects.
Findings
Thresholding amplifies privacy noise impact.
Simple models effectively capture discrepancies.
Proposed mitigation improves district population balance.
Abstract
Data from the Decennial Census is published only after applying a disclosure avoidance system (DAS). Data users were shaken by the adoption of differential privacy in the 2020 DAS, a radical departure from past methods. The goal of this paper is to better understand how the perturbations from the 2020 DAS combine with sharp legal thresholds to impact redistricting. We consider two redistricting settings in which a data user might be concerned about the impacts of privacy preserving noise: drawing equal population districts and litigating voting rights cases. What discrepancies arise if the user does nothing to account for disclosure avoidance? How can the discrepancies be understood and accounted for? We study these questions by comparing the official 2010 Redistricting Data to the 2010 Demonstration Data--created using the 2020 DAS--in an analysis of millions of algorithmically…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCensus and Population Estimation
