STLM Engineering Report: Dropout
Dylan Hillier, Leon Guertler, Bobby Cheng, Cheston Tan

TL;DR
This paper investigates the effectiveness of dropout in small and large language models, revealing its continued relevance for overfitting and potential benefits for model fitting even with abundant data, challenging existing explanations.
Contribution
It provides new insights into dropout's role in language models under different data regimes, especially for models under 100M parameters.
Findings
Dropout remains effective for overfitting scenarios.
Dropout may improve model fit even with large datasets.
Existing explanations for dropout's mechanism are not fully applicable to language models.
Abstract
In this work we explore the relevance of dropout for modern language models, particularly in the context of models on the scale of <100M parameters. We explore it's relevance firstly in the regime of improving the sample efficiency of models given small, high quality datasets, and secondly in the regime of improving the quality of its fit on larger datasets where models may underfit. We find that concordant with conventional wisdom, dropout remains effective in the overfitting scenario, and that furthermore it may have some relevance for improving the fit of models even in the case of excess data, as suggested by previous research. In the process we find that the existing explanation for the mechanism behind this performance gain is not applicable in the case of language modelling.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpacecraft Design and Technology
MethodsDropout
