Robust Non-adaptive Group Testing under Errors in Group Membership Specifications
Shuvayan Banerjee, Radhendushka Srivastava, James Saunderson, Ajit Rajwade

TL;DR
This paper introduces the DRLT method, a robust group testing approach that effectively identifies defective samples and erroneous group memberships despite specification errors, extending Lasso bias mitigation techniques.
Contribution
The paper proposes the DRLT method, a novel robust group testing technique that handles group membership errors and provides theoretical error bounds, improving over existing methods.
Findings
DRLT outperforms baseline methods in identifying defective samples.
Theoretical bounds on reconstruction error are established.
Numerical results demonstrate the effectiveness of DRLT in practical scenarios.
Abstract
Given samples, each of which may or may not be defective, group testing (GT) aims to determine their defect status by performing tests on `groups', where a group is formed by mixing a subset of the samples. Assuming that the number of defective samples is very small compared to , GT algorithms have provided excellent recovery of the status of all samples with even a small number of groups. Most existing methods, however, assume that the group memberships are accurately specified. This assumption may not always be true in all applications, due to various resource constraints. Such errors could occur, eg, when a technician, preparing the groups in a laboratory, unknowingly mixes together an incorrect subset of samples as compared to what was specified. We develop a new GT method, the Debiased Robust Lasso Test Method (DRLT), that handles such group membership…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
