The limits of progress in the digital era
Joaquin Luque

TL;DR
This paper discusses the inherent limits of progress in the digital era, emphasizing that technological knowledge, especially in software design, has intrinsic boundaries that must be acknowledged in our pursuit of progress.
Contribution
It highlights the conceptual and practical limits of technological knowledge, particularly in software design, and argues that progress should consider these inherent constraints.
Findings
Technological knowledge has intrinsic limits.
Progress is bounded by material and knowledge constraints.
Software design faces fundamental limitations in the digital era.
Abstract
The concept of progress clearly percolates the activities in science, technology, economy and society. It is a driving vector (probably the main vector) of our daily activity as researchers. The InThisGen initiative, proudly displayed in places across the University of Berkeley campus, and its headline lemma (what can we change in a single generation?) are clear exponents of the underlying assumption that progress is not only possible but also desirable. But about the concept of progress two major concerns arise. First of all, progress means some kind of going forward, that is a direction in a journey. But deciding the way in the route clearly implies that we are explicit or implicitly defining the goals, as individuals and as society. That is, the concept of progress has a set of underlying values. Additionally, the conceptual paradigm in scientific research (and probably in the whole…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScience and Climate Studies · Education, Technology, and Ethics · Information Systems Theories and Implementation
