Mass & Light in Galaxy Clusters: The case of Abell 370

TL;DR

This study revisits the mass distribution of galaxy cluster Abell 370 using strong lensing data, revealing limitations of parametric models and emphasizing the need for more realistic approaches in gravitational lensing analysis.

Contribution

The paper introduces a new four dark matter clumps model without external shear and critically evaluates parametric models' limitations in describing cluster mass distributions.

Findings

A four dark matter clumps model without external shear fits data better.

Parametric models often produce misleading features and poorly constrained parameters.

Total mass maps align well with stellar distributions, both showing bimodality.

Abstract

Parametric strong lensing studies of galaxy clusters often display "misleading features". This is the case in the galaxy cluster Abell 370. Using strong lensing techniques, it has been described parametrically by a four dark matter clumps model and galaxy scale perturbers, as well as a significant external shear component, which physical origin remains a challenge. The dark matter distribution features a mass clump with no stellar counterpart and a significant offset between one of the dark matter clumps and its associated stellar counterpart. In this paper, based on BUFFALO data, we begin by revisiting this mass model. We find a four dark matter clumps solution which does not require any external shear and provides a slightly better RMS compared to previous models. Investigating further this new solution, we present a class of models which can accurately reproduce the strong lensing data, but whose parameters for the dark matter component are poorly constrained. We then develop a model where each large scale dark matter component must be associated with a stellar counterpart. This model is unable to reproduce the observational constraints with an RMS smaller than 2.3", and the parameters describing this dark matter component remain poorly constrained. Examining the total projected mass maps, we find a good agreement between the total mass and the stellar distribution, both being bimodal. We interpret the "misleading features" of the four dark matter clumps mass model and the failure of the three dark matter clumps mass model as being symptomatic of the lack of realism of a parametric description of the dark matter distribution, and encourage caution and criticism on the outputs of parametric strong lensing modelling. We briefly discuss the implications of our results for using Abell 370 as a gravitational telescope.