Hyper-bishops, Hyper-rooks, and Hyper-queens: Percentage of Safe Squares on Higher Dimensional Chess Boards
Caroline Cashman, Joseph Cooper, Raul Marquez, Steven J. Miller, and Jenna Shuffelton

TL;DR
This paper generalizes the problem of safe squares in chess variants to higher dimensions, providing probabilistic results for the proportion of safe squares with various pieces including hyper-rooks, hyper-bishops, and hyper-queens.
Contribution
It introduces new models for hyper-chess pieces in higher dimensions and derives the asymptotic proportion of safe squares for these pieces using combinatorial and probabilistic methods.
Findings
Proportion of safe squares with hyper-rooks converges to 1/e^k.
Proportion of safe squares with bishops in 2D converges to 2/e^2.
Extended analysis of queens and their higher-dimensional analogs.
Abstract
The queens problem considers the maximum number of safe squares on an chess board when placing queens; the answer is only known for small . Miller, Sheng and Turek considered instead randomly placed rooks, proving the proportion of safe squares converges to . We generalize and solve when randomly placing hyper-rooks and line-rooks on a -dimensional board, using combinatorial and probabilistic methods, with the proportion of safe squares converging to . We prove that the proportion of safe squares on an board with bishops in 2 dimensions converges to . This problem is significantly more interesting and difficult; while a rook attacks the same number of squares wherever it's placed, this is not so for bishops. We expand to the -dimensional chessboard, defining line-bishops to attack along -dimensional…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Games · Sports Analytics and Performance
