Deanonymizing Ethereum Validators: The P2P Network Has a Privacy Issue
Lioba Heimbach, Yann Vonlanthen, Juan Villacis, Lucianna, Kiffer, Roger Wattenhofer

TL;DR
This paper reveals that Ethereum's P2P network fails to protect validator anonymity, enabling deanonymization through a new methodology that locates and analyzes validator distribution and hosting details.
Contribution
The study introduces a practical deanonymization technique for Ethereum validators and empirically demonstrates its effectiveness using real network data.
Findings
Over 15% of validators located in the network
Validators' geographic and organizational distribution mapped
Method highlights privacy risks in Ethereum's P2P network
Abstract
Many blockchain networks aim to preserve the anonymity of validators in the peer-to-peer (P2P) network, ensuring that no adversary can link a validator's identifier to the IP address of a peer due to associated privacy and security concerns. This work demonstrates that the Ethereum P2P network does not offer this anonymity. We present a methodology that enables any node in the network to identify validators hosted on connected peers and empirically verify the feasibility of our proposed method. Using data collected from four nodes over three days, we locate more than 15% of Ethereum validators in the P2P network. The insights gained from our deanonymization technique provide valuable information on the distribution of validators across peers, their geographic locations, and hosting organizations. We further discuss the implications and risks associated with the lack of anonymity in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPeer-to-Peer Network Technologies · Semantic Web and Ontologies · Data Quality and Management
