On Classical Determinate Truth
Luca Castaldo, Carlo Nicolai

TL;DR
This paper introduces new classical, compositional theories of truth and determinateness that unify classical logic with a natural class of determinate sentences, extending Kripke-Feferman truth and comparing favorably to recent theories.
Contribution
Theories are fully compositional, classical, and include a defined determinateness predicate, providing a natural and principled approach to truth and determinateness in logic.
Findings
Theories capture a natural class of determinate sentences.
They are proof-theoretically equivalent to Fujimoto and Halbach's $ ext{C}^+$.
Negative results show primitive determinateness predicates limit semantic rule formulation.
Abstract
The paper proposes and studies new classical, type-free theories of truth and determinateness with unprecedented features. The theories are fully compositional, strongly classical (namely, their internal and external logics are both classical), and feature a \emph{defined} determinateness predicate satisfying desirable and widely agreed principles. The theories capture a conception of truth and determinateness according to which the generalizing power associated with the classicality and full compositionality of truth is combined with the identification of a natural class of sentences -- the determinate ones -- for which clear-cut semantic rules are available. Our theories can also be seen as the \emph{classical closures} of Kripke-Feferman truth: their -models, which we precisely pinned down, result from including in the extension of the truth predicate the sentences that are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhilosophy and Theoretical Science
