Transposition of variables is hard to describe
H. Andr\'eka, I. N\'emeti, Zs. Tuza

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates the complexity of describing variable transpositions in finite-variable first-order logic, showing that certain algebraic classes cannot be finitely axiomatized and exploring implications for proof systems.
Contribution
It proves that the class of representable polyadic equality algebras of finite dimension cannot be finitely axiomatized, addressing a long-standing open problem and analyzing the structure of related algebraic varieties.
Findings
Finitely axiomatizing representable polyadic algebras is impossible for dimensions ≥ 3.
Constructs a family of nonrepresentable algebras approaching representability.
Investigates the lattice of subvarieties and poses open problems.
Abstract
The function that interchanges two logical variables in formulas is hard to describe in the following sense. Let denote the Lindenbaum-Tarski formula-algebra of a finite-variable first order logic, endowed with as a unary function. Each equational axiom system for the equational theory of has to contain, for each finite , an equation that contains together with at least algebraic variables, and each of the operations . This solves a problem raised by Johnson [J. Symb. Logic] more than 50 years ago: the class of representable polyadic equality algebras of a finite dimension cannot be axiomatized by adding finitely many equations to the equational theory of representable cylindric algebras of dimension . Consequences for proof systems of finite-variable logic and for defining equations of polyadic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Logic · Formal Methods in Verification · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
