CMOS compatibility of semiconductor spin qubits
Nard Dumoulin Stuyck, Andre Saraiva, Will Gilbert, Jesus Cifuentes Pardo, Ruoyu Li, Christopher C. Escott, Kristiaan De Greve, Sorin Voinigescu, David J. Reilly, Andrew S. Dzurak

TL;DR
This review discusses the potential for semiconductor spin qubits to be integrated with CMOS technology, highlighting their advantages and the challenges in scaling up for fault-tolerant quantum computing.
Contribution
It analyzes the overlap between semiconductor spin qubits and CMOS VLSI principles, identifying differences and fostering collaboration for industrial-scale quantum processors.
Findings
Semiconductor spin qubits have unique advantages for large-scale FTQC.
Differences exist between spin qubit operation and CMOS practices.
Collaboration with CMOS industry can accelerate quantum processor development.
Abstract
Several domains of society will be disrupted once millions of high-quality qubits can be brought together to perform fault-tolerant quantum computing (FTQC). All quantum computing hardware available today is many orders of magnitude removed from the requirements for FTQC. The intimidating challenges associated with integrating such complex systems have already been addressed by the semiconductor industry -hence many qubit makers have retrofitted their technology to be CMOS-compatible. This compatibility, however, can have varying degrees ranging from the mere ability to fabricate qubits using a silicon wafer as a substrate, all the way to the co-integration of qubits with high-yield, low-power advanced electronics to control these qubits. Extrapolating the evolution of quantum processors to future systems, semiconductor spin qubits have unique advantages in this respect, making them one…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
