Euclid preparation LXXI. Simulations and nonlinearities beyond $\mathsf{\Lambda}$CDM. 3. Constraints on $f(R)$ models from the photometric primary probes
Euclid Collaboration: K. Koyama (1), S. Pamuk (2), S. Casas (2), B. Bose (3), P. Carrilho (3), I. S\'aez-Casares (4), L. Atayde (5, 6), M. Cataneo (7, 8), B. Fiorini (1), C. Giocoli (9, 10), A. M. C. Le Brun (4), F. Pace (11, 12, 13), A. Pourtsidou (3, 14), Y. Rasera (4, 15)

TL;DR
This paper investigates how different nonlinear matter power spectrum models impact constraints on $f(R)$ gravity from Euclid photometric probes, highlighting biases and the importance of accounting for theoretical uncertainties.
Contribution
It compares multiple nonlinear modeling approaches for $f(R)$ gravity and assesses their effects on parameter constraints and biases in Euclid-like weak lensing and galaxy clustering analyses.
Findings
Bias in $f(R)$ parameter constraints depends on the nonlinear model used.
Baryonic physics can bias $f(R)$ constraints if not properly modeled.
Including theoretical errors reduces bias but weakens constraints.
Abstract
We study the constraint on gravity that can be obtained by photometric primary probes of the Euclid mission. Our focus is the dependence of the constraint on the theoretical modelling of the nonlinear matter power spectrum. In the Hu-Sawicki gravity model, we consider four different predictions for the ratio between the power spectrum in and that in CDM: a fitting formula, the halo model reaction approach, ReACT and two emulators based on dark matter only -body simulations, FORGE and e-Mantis. These predictions are added to the MontePython implementation to predict the angular power spectra for weak lensing (WL), photometric galaxy clustering and their cross-correlation. By running Markov Chain Monte Carlo, we compare constraints on parameters and investigate the bias of the recovered parameter if the data are created by a different model. For the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
