A graphical exploration of the relationship between parasite aggregation indices
R. McVinish, R.J.G. Lester

TL;DR
This paper uses graphical methods to explore how different parasite aggregation indices relate to mean abundance and prevalence, revealing nonlinear relationships and questioning the adequacy of correlation as a summary measure.
Contribution
It provides a visual and analytical comparison of various parasite aggregation indices assuming negative binomial distributions, clarifying their interrelationships.
Findings
Relationships between indices are nonlinear
Correlations are insufficient to summarize these relationships
Contour plots effectively illustrate index relationships
Abstract
The level of aggregation in parasite populations is frequently incorporated into ecological studies. It is measured in various ways including variance-to-mean ratio, mean crowding, the parameter of the negative binomial distribution and indices based on the Lorenz curve such as the Gini index (Poulin's D) and the Hoover index. Assuming the frequency distributions follow a negative binomial, we use contour plots to clarify the relationships between aggregation indices, mean abundance and prevalence. The contour plots highlight the nonlinear nature of the relationships between these measures and suggest that correlations are not a suitable summary of these relationships.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCOVID-19 epidemiological studies
