21cm Epoch of Reionisation Power Spectrum with Closure Phase using the Murchison Widefield Array

TL;DR

This study demonstrates the use of closure phase analysis with the Murchison Widefield Array to estimate the 21-cm power spectrum during the Epoch of Reionisation, offering a calibration-independent approach despite current sensitivity limitations.

Contribution

First application of closure phase power spectrum analysis to 21-cm EoR data with MWA, showing potential for calibration-independent cosmological measurements.

Findings

Set upper limits on 21-cm power spectrum at specific scales.

Closure phase estimates are promising despite high current noise levels.

Identified baseline-dependent systematics affecting measurements.

Abstract

The radio interferometric closure phases can be a valuable tool for studying cosmological {H\scriptsize{I}}~from the early Universe. Closure phases have the advantage of being immune to element-based gains and associated calibration errors. Thus, calibration and errors therein, which are often sources of systematics limiting standard visibility-based approaches, can be avoided altogether in closure phase analysis. In this work, we present the first results of the closure phase power spectrum of {H\scriptsize{I}}~21-cm fluctuations using the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA), with $\sim 12$ hours of MWA-phase II observations centered around redshift, $z\approx 6.79$, during the Epoch of Reionisation. On analysing three redundant classes of baselines -- 14~m, 24~m, and 28~m equilateral triads, our estimates of the $2\sigma$ ($95\%$ confidence interval) 21-cm power spectra are $\lesssim (184)^2 pseudo \rm ~mK^2$ at ${k}_{||} = 0.36 $ $pseudo~h {\rm Mpc^{-1}}$ in the EoR1 field for the 14~m baseline triads, and $\lesssim (188)^2 pseudo \rm ~mK^2$ at $k_{||} = 0.18 $ $pseudo~h {\rm Mpc^{-1}}$ in the EoR0 field for the 24~m baseline triads. The ``$pseudo$'' units denote that the length scale and brightness temperature should be interpreted as close approximations. Our best estimates are still 3-4 orders high compared to the fiducial 21-cm power spectrum; however, our approach provides promising estimates of the power spectra even with a small amount of data. These data-limited estimates can be further improved if more datasets are included into the analysis. The evidence for excess noise has a possible origin in baseline-dependent systematics in the MWA data that will require careful baseline-based strategies to mitigate, even in standard visibility-based approaches.