Level Planarity Is More Difficult Than We Thought
Simon D. Fink, Matthias Pfretzschner, Ignaz Rutter, Peter Stumpf

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that existing quadratic time algorithms for the Level Planarity problem can produce incorrect results, indicating the problem's complexity is greater than previously believed.
Contribution
It provides counterexamples showing the limitations of three simple quadratic algorithms for Level Planarity, challenging prior assumptions about their correctness.
Findings
Counterexamples for existing algorithms
Algorithms can falsely reject level planarity
Algorithms can produce non-level planar drawings
Abstract
We consider three simple quadratic time algorithms for the problem Level Planarity and give a level-planar instance that they either falsely report as negative or for which they output a drawing that is not level planar.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
