QCD Perturbation Theory: It's not what you were taught
P. M. Stevenson

TL;DR
This paper argues that in QCD, physical quantities are independent of the coupling constant _s(Q), challenging common assumptions and emphasizing the importance of viewing renormalization-scheme ambiguity as a fundamental symmetry rather than a nuisance.
Contribution
It highlights that renormalized perturbation theory in QCD is fundamentally different from a simple power series and advocates for a paradigm shift in understanding its structure.
Findings
Physical quantities in QCD do not depend on _s(Q).
Renormalization-scheme ambiguity is a fundamental symmetry.
A change in mindset is necessary for QCD to be a proper scientific discipline.
Abstract
Physical quantities in QCD do not depend upon . There is no way to measure experimentally. If those statements sound shocking, please read on. They are actually well-known facts, though ones that are constantly being ignored in the QCD literature. Renormalized perturbation theory is not an ordinary power-series expansion; its renormalization-scheme ambiguity is not merely a minor nuisance. Rather, it is a structure in which invariance under redefinitions of the coupling is a fundamental symmetry -- a symmetry that, like any other, deserves respect. I speak bluntly because without a change in mindset perturbative QCD can never become a proper, scientific enterprise.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
