Coverage Metrics for a Scenario Database for the Scenario-Based Assessment of Automated Driving Systems
Erwin de Gelder, Maren Buermann, Olaf Op den Camp

TL;DR
This paper introduces quantitative coverage metrics to evaluate how well collected driving scenarios represent an ADS's operational domain and the driving data, ensuring comprehensive safety assessment.
Contribution
It proposes novel coverage metrics for assessing the completeness of scenario datasets in relation to the ADS's operational design domain and driving data.
Findings
100% coverage achievable under certain conditions
Metrics identify data gaps for improved coverage
Experiment with 200,000 scenarios from the HighD dataset
Abstract
Automated Driving Systems (ADSs) have the potential to make mobility services available and safe for all. A multi-pillar Safety Assessment Framework (SAF) has been proposed for the type-approval process of ADSs. The SAF requires that the test scenarios for the ADS adequately covers the Operational Design Domain (ODD) of the ADS. A common method for generating test scenarios involves basing them on scenarios identified and characterized from driving data. This work addresses two questions when collecting scenarios from driving data. First, do the collected scenarios cover all relevant aspects of the ADS' ODD? Second, do the collected scenarios cover all relevant aspects that are in the driving data, such that no potentially important situations are missed? This work proposes coverage metrics that provide a quantitative answer to these questions. The proposed coverage metrics are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety · Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy · Simulation Techniques and Applications
