Widespread misidentification of SEM instruments in the peer-reviewed materials science and engineering literature
Reese AK Richardson, Jeonghyun Moon, Spencer S Hong, Lu\'is A Nunes, Amaral
TL;DR
This paper highlights the frequent misidentification of SEM instruments in materials science literature, emphasizing the need for improved accuracy in reporting equipment details.
Contribution
It systematically analyzes the extent of SEM instrument misidentification in peer-reviewed publications, revealing widespread inaccuracies.
Findings
High prevalence of SEM misidentification in literature
Implications for reproducibility and data integrity
Calls for standardized reporting practices
Abstract
Removed per arXiv policy. Please see version at https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/4wqcr
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques