
TL;DR
This paper refines the maxmin approach to robustness, ensuring payoff guarantees are stable near the ambiguity set, and shows how to modify ambiguity sets for robustness.
Contribution
It introduces a refinement of the maxmin robustness concept and provides a method to modify ambiguity sets to ensure robustness of payoff guarantees.
Findings
Many maxmin-optimal mechanisms are fragile and not robust.
Certain ambiguity sets guarantee robustness of payoff guarantees.
Any ambiguity set can be slightly enriched to ensure robustness.
Abstract
We propose a refinement of the maxmin approach to robustness. A mechanism's payoff guarantee over an ambiguity set is \emph{robust} if the guarantee is approximately satisfied at priors near the ambiguity set (in the weak topology). We show that many maxmin-optimal mechanisms in the literature give payoff guarantees that are not robust. Such mechanisms are often tailored to degenerate worst-case priors, making them simple but fragile. Conversely, some commonly used ambiguity sets satisfy a structural property which ensures that every associated payoff guarantee is robust. We show how any ambiguity set can be slightly enriched to satisfy this property.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
