Beyond MR Image Harmonization: Resolution Matters Too

TL;DR

This paper investigates how image resolution affects the performance of MR image harmonization algorithms, highlighting the importance of considering resolution and orientation variations for reliable clinical imaging analysis.

Contribution

The study evaluates the impact of resolution on a pretrained harmonization algorithm and discusses optimal acquisition scenarios, emphasizing the need to account for resolution in clinical MR imaging.

Findings

Harmonization performance varies with image resolution and orientation.

Low-resolution images pose challenges for effective harmonization.

Super-resolution can mitigate some resolution-related issues.

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is commonly used in the clinical setting to non-invasively monitor the body. There exists a large variability in MR imaging due to differences in scanner hardware, software, and protocol design. Ideally, a processing algorithm should perform robustly to this variability, but that is not always the case in reality. This introduces a need for image harmonization to overcome issues of domain shift when performing downstream analysis such as segmentation. Most image harmonization models focus on acquisition parameters such as inversion time or repetition time, but they ignore an important aspect in MR imaging -- resolution. In this paper, we evaluate the impact of image resolution on harmonization using a pretrained harmonization algorithm. We simulate 2D acquisitions of various slice thicknesses and gaps from 3D acquired, 1mm3 isotropic MR images and demonstrate how the performance of a state-of-the-art image harmonization algorithm varies as resolution changes. We discuss the most ideal scenarios for image resolution including acquisition orientation when 3D imaging is not available, which is common for many clinical scanners. Our results show that harmonization on low-resolution images does not account for acquisition resolution and orientation variations. Super-resolution can be used to alleviate resolution variations but it is not always used. Our methodology can generalize to help evaluate the impact of image acquisition resolution for multiple tasks. Determining the limits of a pretrained algorithm is important when considering preprocessing steps and trust in the results.