Direct finiteness of representable regular rings with involution: A counterexample
Christian Herrmann

TL;DR
This paper constructs a specific $*$-regular $*$-ring of endomorphisms on a Hilbert space demonstrating that direct finiteness does not always hold in such algebraic structures, providing a counterexample to previous assumptions.
Contribution
It introduces a novel counterexample of a $*$-regular $*$-ring where direct finiteness fails, expanding understanding of algebraic properties in operator rings.
Findings
Counterexample of a $*$-regular $*$-ring with non-finite behavior
Demonstrates failure of direct finiteness in certain algebraic structures
Uses shift operators on Hilbert space to construct the example
Abstract
Bruns and Roddy constructed a -generated modular ortholattice which cannot be embedded into any complete modular ortholattice. Motivated by their approach, we use shift operators to construct a -regular -ring of endomorphisms of an inner product space (which can be chosen as the Hilbert space ) such that direct finiteness fails for .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRings, Modules, and Algebras · Advanced Topics in Algebra · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
