Fairness, Accuracy, and Unreliable Data
Kevin Stangl

TL;DR
This thesis explores how fairness, strategic classification, and robustness issues affect machine learning reliability, emphasizing the importance of aligning empirical risk minimization with real-world data complexities.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical analysis of challenges in fairness, strategic classification, and robustness, guiding better practices for reliable machine learning systems.
Findings
Identifies limitations of empirical risk minimization in complex data settings
Provides theoretical insights into fairness and robustness challenges
Suggests strategies for designing more reliable machine learning algorithms
Abstract
This thesis investigates three areas targeted at improving the reliability of machine learning; fairness in machine learning, strategic classification, and algorithmic robustness. Each of these domains has special properties or structure that can complicate learning. A theme throughout this thesis is thinking about ways in which a `plain' empirical risk minimization algorithm will be misleading or ineffective because of a mis-match between classical learning theory assumptions and specific properties of some data distribution in the wild. Theoretical understanding in eachof these domains can help guide best practices and allow for the design of effective, reliable, and robust systems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQualitative Comparative Analysis Research
