Evidence of controlling vortex matter via a superconducting Nanobridge

TL;DR

This paper theoretically studies how a superconducting nanobridge can control vortex states through its geometry and external currents, using TDGL theory to analyze magnetic responses and vortex dynamics.

Contribution

It demonstrates that nanobridge dimensions and induced currents can stabilize and manipulate vortex states in superconducting systems, providing insights for vortex control.

Findings

Nanobridge dimensions critically influence vortex stabilization.

Induced currents cause vortex movement within the nanobridge.

Geometry and external currents enable vortex control in superconducting nanostructures.

Abstract

We theoretically investigate the magnetic response on a three-dimensional superconducting nanobridge system, which is compound of two parallel parallelepiped (samples) connected through a nanobridge of size $\mathbf{L}$ and thickness $\mathbf{x}$, which mediates interactions between them. This study is conducted in the presence of a magnetic field $\mathbf{H}$ and the transport of a direct current $\mathbf{J}$. We use the well-know time dependent Ginzburg-Landau theory ($\mathbf{TDGL}$) for analyzed the possible effects on the density Gibbs free energy $\mathbf{F}$, magnetization $\mathbf{M}$, and superconducting electronic Cooper pair density $|\psi|^{2}$. We are interested in studying two cases: varying the $\mathbf{L}$ and $\mathbf{x}$ of the nanobridge in the absence of induced $\mathbf{J}$, and including the induction of external $\mathbf{J}$ for fixed $\mathbf{L}$ and $\mathbf{x}$. We find that $\mathbf{L}$ and $\mathbf{x}$ play an essential role in stabilizing (controlling) vortex states in the nanobridge, and the presence of induced $\mathbf{J}$ ($\mathbf{J}>0$ and $\mathbf{J}<0$), with a fixed $\mathbf{L}$ and $\mathbf{x}$, causes the movement of vortex states in the nanobridge just when $\mathbf{J}$ is induced at both faces of superconducting nanobridge system.