Evaluating Credit VIX (CDS IV) Prediction Methods with Incremental Batch Learning
Robert Taylor

TL;DR
This study compares SVM, Gradient Boosting, and Attention-GRU models in predicting credit default swap implied volatility using incremental learning, aiming to identify effective methods for financial risk forecasting.
Contribution
It introduces a comparative evaluation of multiple machine learning models with incremental learning for CDS implied volatility prediction.
Findings
Gradient Boosting outperforms other models in accuracy
Attention-GRU shows strong temporal pattern recognition
Classical ML methods remain competitive with SOTA techniques
Abstract
This paper presents the experimental process and results of SVM, Gradient Boosting, and an Attention-GRU Hybrid model in predicting the Implied Volatility of rolled-over five-year spread contracts of credit default swaps (CDS) on European corporate debt during the quarter following mid-May '24, as represented by the iTraxx/Cboe Europe Main 1-Month Volatility Index (BP Volatility). The analysis employs a feature matrix inspired by Merton's determinants of default probability. Our comparative assessment aims to identify strengths in SOTA and classical machine learning methods for financial risk prediction
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinancial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
MethodsSupport Vector Machine
