Improving propulsive efficiency using bio-inspired intermittent locomotion

TL;DR

This paper demonstrates that bio-inspired intermittent propeller motion, mimicking fish burst-and-coast swimming, can significantly improve energy efficiency, with potential savings up to 24%, by leveraging passive reconfiguration and drag reduction.

Contribution

It introduces a novel reconfigurable propeller inspired by fish locomotion that achieves energy savings through intermittent operation and provides an analytical model for efficiency comparison.

Findings

Intermittent propulsion saves up to 24% energy compared to continuous rotation.

A drag ratio exceeding 65% in coast phases enhances efficiency.

Passive reconfiguration of the propeller enables effective burst-and-coast motion.

Abstract

Many swimmers, especially small to medium-sized animals, use intermittent locomotion that differs from continuous swimming of large species. This type of locomotion, called burst-and-coast, is often associated with an energetic advantage. In this work, we investigate the intermittent locomotion inspired by fish locomotion but applied to a propeller. The energy consumption of burst-and-coast cycles is measured and compared to the continuous rotation regime. We show that a substantial drag ratio between the active and passive phases of the motion, as observed in fish, is critical for energy savings. Such a contrast can be obtained using a folding propeller that passively opens and closes as the propeller starts and stops rotating. For this reconfigurable propeller, intermittent propulsion is found to be energetically advantageous, saving up to 24% of the energy required to cruise at a given speed. Using an analytical model, we show that intermittent motion is more efficient than continuous motion when the drag reduction in the coast phase exceeds 65%. For fish-like locomotion, this threshold seems to be closer to 30%. A formal analogy allows us to explain the difference between propeller propulsion and fish locomotion.