Hydrostatic mass of galaxy clusters within some theories of gravity
Feri Apryandi, M. Lawrence Pattersons

TL;DR
This paper investigates the hydrostatic mass of galaxy clusters within various modified gravity theories, comparing results to Newtonian predictions and baryonic masses, revealing that EiBI theory better alleviates mass discrepancy but does not fully resolve it.
Contribution
It derives hydrostatic masses of galaxy clusters in multiple modified gravity theories and compares their effectiveness in addressing mass discrepancy issues.
Findings
All theories match Newtonian mass in certain regimes.
EiBI theory with specific parameters better fits baryonic mass data.
Neither EiBI nor BHG fully resolves the mass discrepancy.
Abstract
The mass of galaxy clusters (GCs) can be determined by calculating the hydrostatic equilibrium equation. In this work, we derive the hydrostatic mass of GCs within Eddington-inspired Born-Infeld (EiBI) theory, beyond Horndeski gravity (BHG), and modified emergent Newtonian gravity (MENG) with generalized uncertainty principle (GUP) correction. We apply the formulations on the masses of 10 GCs. We compare our results with the Newtonian mass of GCs. Within a regime, we get an insight that all formulations could match the Newtonian mass. Thus, the impact of the modified theories of gravity used in this work can be neglected in this regime. The noteworthy impact starts if we set m for EiBI theory, for BHG, and for MENG. We also compare our results from EiBI theory and BHG with the baryonic masses…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeophysics and Gravity Measurements · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
