Enhancing Depression Diagnosis with Chain-of-Thought Prompting
Elysia Shi, Adithri Manda, London Chowdhury, Runeema Arun, Kevin Zhu,, Michael Lam

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that using chain-of-thought prompting with AI models improves the accuracy of depression severity assessments based on PHQ-8 scores, advancing AI's role in mental health diagnostics.
Contribution
It introduces the application of chain-of-thought prompting to enhance AI accuracy in depression diagnosis through PHQ-8 score evaluation.
Findings
CoT prompting yields PHQ-8 score estimates closer to true scores
AI models with CoT reasoning better understand patient conversations
Improved diagnostic accuracy with CoT in mental health assessment
Abstract
When using AI to detect signs of depressive disorder, AI models habitually draw preemptive conclusions. We theorize that using chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting to evaluate Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) scores will improve the accuracy of the scores determined by AI models. In our findings, when the models reasoned with CoT, the estimated PHQ-8 scores were consistently closer on average to the accepted true scores reported by each participant compared to when not using CoT. Our goal is to expand upon AI models' understanding of the intricacies of human conversation, allowing them to more effectively assess a patient's feelings and tone, therefore being able to more accurately discern mental disorder symptoms; ultimately, we hope to augment AI models' abilities, so that they can be widely accessible and used in the medical field.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMental Health Research Topics
