Huber-robust likelihood ratio tests for composite nulls and alternatives
Aytijhya Saha, Aaditya Ramdas

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new e-value based framework for robust sequential hypothesis testing of composite nulls versus alternatives, effective even with data corruption and without regularity conditions.
Contribution
It develops optimal robust e-value tests for composite hypotheses using LFDs, including new methods when LFDs do not exist, applicable in sequential and non-i.i.d. contamination models.
Findings
Supermartingale growth under alternatives at optimal rate
Type-I error control without regularity conditions
Asymptotic rate converges to classical KL divergence as contamination vanishes
Abstract
We propose an e-value based framework for testing arbitrary composite nulls against composite alternatives, when an fraction of the data can be arbitrarily corrupted. Our tests are inherently sequential, being valid at arbitrary data-dependent stopping times, but they are new even for fixed sample sizes, giving type-I error control without any regularity conditions. We first prove that least favourable distribution (LFD) pairs, when they exist, yield optimal e-values for testing arbitrary composite nulls against composite alternatives. Then we show that if an LFD pair exists for some composite null and alternative, then the LFDs of Huber's -contamination or total variation (TV) neighborhoods around that specific pair form the optimal LFD pair for the corresponding robustified composite hypotheses. Furthermore, where LFDs do not exist, we develop new robust composite…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models · Optimal Experimental Design Methods · Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
