Informativeness and Trust in Bayesian Persuasion
Reema Deori, Ankur A. Kulkarni

TL;DR
This paper analyzes Bayesian persuasion, characterizing the maximum utility and truthful information revealed through linear programming, highlighting the importance of trust constraints and informativeness in persuasion strategies.
Contribution
It introduces a linear programming framework to quantify the Stackelberg game value and informativeness, incorporating trust constraints that limit obfuscation in Bayesian persuasion.
Findings
Stackelberg game value characterized by linear program.
Informativeness defined via linear program with trust constraints.
Closed-form solutions provided for structured utility functions.
Abstract
A persuasion policy successfully persuades an agent to pick a particular action only if the information is designed in a manner that convinces the agent that it is in their best interest to pick that action. Thus, it is natural to ask, what makes the agent trust the persuader's suggestion? We study a Bayesian persuasion interaction between a sender and a receiver where the sender has access to private information and the receiver attempts to recover this information from messages sent by the sender. The sender crafts these messages in an attempt to maximize its utility which depends on the source symbol and the symbol recovered by the receiver. Our goal is to characterize the \textit{Stackelberg game value}, and the amount of true information revealed by the sender during persuasion. We find that the SGV is given by the optimal value of a \textit{linear program} on probability…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOpinion Dynamics and Social Influence
