Detection of gamma-ray burst Amati relation based on Hubble data set and Pantheon+ samples
Yufen Han, Jiaze Gao, Gang Liu, Lixin Xu

TL;DR
This study calibrates gamma-ray burst luminosity relations using Hubble and Pantheon+ data, finding the standard Amati relation remains most consistent without evidence of redshift evolution.
Contribution
It introduces a calibration method using Gaussian processes and compares the Amati relation across datasets, confirming its stability over redshift.
Findings
No evidence of redshift evolution in the Amati relation
Standard Amati relation remains the best fit for gamma-ray bursts
Redshift evolution coefficients are not statistically significant
Abstract
Using gamma-ray bursts as standard candles for cosmological parameter constraints rely on their empirical luminosity relations and low-redshift calibration. In this paper, we examine the Amati relation and its potential corrections based on the A118 sample of higher-quality gamma-ray bursts, using both Hubble data set and Pantheon+ samples as calibration samples in the redshift range of z < 1.965. In calibrating gamma-ray bursts using these two datasets, we employ Gaussian processes to obtain corresponding Hubble diagrams to avoid the dependence on cosmological models in the calibration process. We first divided the low-redshift sample of GRBs into two bins and examined the Amati relation and its potential modifications. We found that under both calibrations, the Amati relation did not show evidence of redshift evolution (68% confidence level). For the other two Amati relations that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGamma-ray bursts and supernovae · Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
