Do we need wavelets in the late Universe?
Luis A. Escamilla, Emre \"Oz\"ulker, \"Ozg\"ur Akarsu, Eleonora Di Valentino, J. A. V\'azquez

TL;DR
This paper introduces wavelet-modified Hubble functions to explore late-time oscillations in the universe's expansion, finding that BAO data favor wavelets and improve fit quality, especially with DESI data.
Contribution
It proposes a novel wavelet-based parametrization of the Hubble function that captures late-time oscillations without affecting early universe constraints.
Findings
Wavelets improve fit to BAO data, especially with DESI.
Wavelet center prefers z~0.7 with DESI, higher z with SDSS.
Dark energy density oscillates and can be negative at high z.
Abstract
We parameterize the Hubble function by adding Hermitian wavelets to the Hubble radius of CDM. This allows us to build Hubble functions that oscillate around CDM at late times without modifying its angular diameter distance to last scattering. We perform parameter inference and model selection procedures on these new Hubble functions at the background level. In our analyses consisting of a wide variety of cosmological observations, we find that baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) data play a crucial role in determining the constraints on the wavelet parameters. In particular, we focus on the differences between SDSS- and DESI-BAO datasets and find that wavelets provide a better fit to the data when either of the BAO datasets is present. However, DESI-BAO has a preference for the center of the wavelets to be around , while SDSS-BAO prefers higher redshifts of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories
