Dataset | Mindset = Explainable AI | Interpretable AI
Caesar Wu, Rajkumar Buyya, Yuan Fang Li, Pascal Bouvry

TL;DR
This paper clarifies the distinctions between explainable AI (XAI) and interpretable AI (IAI), emphasizing that XAI focuses on dataset analysis while IAI involves a mindset, with implications for ethical and trustworthy AI.
Contribution
It proposes a conceptual framework differentiating XAI and IAI, supported by empirical experiments, to guide AI transparency, ethics, and policy development.
Findings
XAI emphasizes post-hoc dataset analysis
IAI involves a priori mindset of abstraction
Empirical experiments support the framework
Abstract
We often use "explainable" Artificial Intelligence (XAI)" and "interpretable AI (IAI)" interchangeably when we apply various XAI tools for a given dataset to explain the reasons that underpin machine learning (ML) outputs. However, these notions can sometimes be confusing because interpretation often has a subjective connotation, while explanations lean towards objective facts. We argue that XAI is a subset of IAI. The concept of IAI is beyond the sphere of a dataset. It includes the domain of a mindset. At the core of this ambiguity is the duality of reasons, in which we can reason either outwards or inwards. When directed outwards, we want the reasons to make sense through the laws of nature. When turned inwards, we want the reasons to be happy, guided by the laws of the heart. While XAI and IAI share reason as the common notion for the goal of transparency, clarity, fairness,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
