
TL;DR
This paper explores the properties of S-flat preenvelopes in module theory, providing counterexamples that challenge assumptions about coherence and S-coherence in rings.
Contribution
It demonstrates that coherence of a ring does not guarantee the existence of S-flat preenvelopes for all modules, and that S-coherence does not imply ring coherence.
Findings
A ring being coherent does not ensure all modules have S-flat preenvelopes.
R_S being coherent does not imply R is S-coherent.
Counterexamples to common assumptions in module and ring theory.
Abstract
In this note, we investigate the notion of -flat preenvelopes of modules. In particular, we give an example that a ring being coherent does not imply that every -module have an -flat preenvelope, giving a negative answer to the question proposed by Bennis and Bouziri \cite{BB24}. Besides, we also show that is a coherent ring also does not imply that is an -coherent ring in general.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematics and Applications · Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation · Point processes and geometric inequalities
