Non-Stabilizing Parallel Chip-Firing Games
David Ji, Michael Li, and Daniel Wang

TL;DR
This paper investigates the behavior of parallel chip-firing games at a specific activity level, proving non-stabilization and certain period properties within a critical range of chip counts, extending previous results to bipartite graphs.
Contribution
It extends analysis of chip-firing game activity levels to bipartite graphs, proving non-stabilization and specific period constraints in the middle activity staircase.
Findings
Games with $2|E|-|V|< |\sigma|< 2|E|$ are non-stabilizing.
All such games have periods not equal to 3 or 4.
Conjecture: these games have period 2 and activity 1/2, proven for specific graph classes.
Abstract
In 2010, Kominers and Kominers proved that any parallel chip-firing game on with chips stabilizes. Recently, Bu, Choi, and Xu made the bound exact: all games with chips or chips stabilize. Meanwhile, Levine found a "devil's staircase'' pattern in the plot of the activity of parallel chip-firing games against their density of chips. The stabilizing bound of Bu, Choi, and Xu corresponds to the top and bottom stairs of this staircase, in which the activity is 1 and 0, respectively. In this paper, we analyze the middle stair of the staircase, corresponding to activity . We prove that all parallel chip-firing games with have period . In fact, this is exactly the range of for which all games are non-stabilizing. We conjecture that all parallel chip-firing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCellular Automata and Applications · Game Theory and Applications · Optimization and Search Problems
